I believe Law as Results means WINNING -- meeting with clients to determine their needs and designing a strategy to achieve their goals. That frees my clients to concentrate on living their lives and profitably running their businesses.

As a member of our Commercial Litigation and Construction Law Groups, I am uniquely positioned to understand the needs of businesses in effectively managing risk to avoid litigation. And, when needed, effectively and economically running litigation to achieve the best result possible for each client in each situation.

I have successfully represented clients on a wide range of commercial and business issues, including such things as breach of contract, fraud, non-compete agreement and other partnership and corporate disputes. I have done so across the country, including courts in Washington, Oregon, Nevada, Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho and New York. My work has involved everything from minor issues to "bet the company" cases.

In construction law, I've represented all levels of contractors, as well as owners, in a wide range of cases involving construction defects in condominium projects to delay and impact claims to misappropriation of building plans. In doing so, I've obtained large monetary recoveries, as well as injunctive relief. I have also assisted clients in protesting the award of public projects in front of state and federal agencies.

Each and every day, I'm motivated to help guide my clients to avoid litigation, or, barring that, to act in a strategic manner designed to accomplish their individual goals. This is Mark Rosencrantz. This is Law as Results.

RESULTS IN ACTION

Marple v. Turner, et al. (Nev. State Ct.)
- Negotiated business divorce allowing co-founder of digital media company to open competing venture with use of all corporate software products.

Quest Integrated, Inc. v. Worby (Wash. State Ct.)
- Obtained permanent injunction preventing former employee from breaching non-competition agreement by interfering with client relationships, violating the UTSA and working for competitor.

Sabbagh v. Ohana, LLC, et al. (Wash. State Ct.)
- Negotiated settlement in which investor extricated herself from approximately $15 million in personal guarantees and a multi-state fraudulent conspiracy without the payment of any sums.

KC Investments, LLC v. Venture Bank (Wash. State Ct.)
- Assisted investor in regaining land seized by bank in wrongful foreclosure.

Lawyer Mechanical Services, Inc. v. TriCom Co., Inc., et al. (Nev. State Ct.)
- Obtained injunction prohibiting former employee and his new employer from violating non-competition agreement and UTSA.

Sharon v. Fox Broadcasting, America's Most Wanted, et al. (D. Nev.)
- Drafted successful motion to dismiss against allegations of misappropriation of person, slander, and violation of civil rights arising from episodes of America's Most Wanted.

CH2M HILL, Inc. v. McAdams Technologies, Inc. (W.D. Wash)
- Obtained judgment exceeding $1 million for subcontractor on four federal contracts.

Sysco Food of Services of Seattle v. State of Washington (Wash. State Ct.)
- Caused Washington Office of State Procurement to withdraw award of contract valued at more than $100,000,000 for failure of State to follow its procurement guidelines.

AREAS OF PRACTICE:

Commercial Litigation

EDUCATION:

Seattle University School of Law (J.D., cum laude, 1996)

University of Oregon (B.A., 1992)

ASSOCIATIONS:

Washington State Bar Association

ADMITTED TO PRACTICE:

Washington State Courts

Nevada State Courts
U.S. District Courts, Western District of Washington
U.S. District Court, District of Nevada

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

United States Court of Federal Claims

STATE LICENSES:

Washington, 1996
Nevada, 1997

Mark Rosencrantz

10.0/10

Superb

View lawyer's profile